Baptism, Infant, Old Testament, For the Dead, Etc.

Baptism, Infant, Old Testament, For the Dead,  Etc.

To access more articles on this topic click on "Read more"

The Meaning of Baptism—and How It Makes the Gospel Visible  
Do Baptists Talk to Their Babies?
Baptism For the Dead 
Does Baptism Justify? 
Infant Baptism in the History of the Church 
The Case for Covenantal Continuity in the Sacramental Life of the Church 
Christians Should Baptize Their Children, but Not Because of Circumcision 
Crystalline Baptism 

When the topic of faith is discussed among protestants and their modern evangelical cousins there is a tendency to define the word differently. This is a big reason why the modern evangelical rejects the baptism of infants as practiced by the majority of the church for the last two thousand years.

What evangelicals understand faith to be and what we understand it to be are not the same things. Evangelicals define faith in terms of knowledge. The accepting of a certain set of facts as true. But that's not what faith is. Faith, to believe, is a question of trust and loyalty. No one needs to know all of the facts to do that.

In fact... all an infant does is trust. Loyalty comes naturally to them. They need no facts. They trust their mother to love them, their father to protect them, and why not their God to save them?

But where is this taught in the Bible? In the very definition of the word itself. The word for what evangelicals define as faith is epignosis. It literally means precise and correct knowledge. But the word rendered faith and or belief is pistis. It means trust and loyalty. Two completely different concepts.

Send a Message

I'm here to help answer any questions you have about Protestant Trinitarian theology or any other Biblical question you have. Fill out the form below to get in touch with me and begin your journey of exploring faith and cultivating wisdom.

Contact Information